White Rose is a protest blog collective focusing on civil liberties in the UK.
It was set up to point a finger at the erosion of personal freedom in the UK.
Government's active measures introduce new means of control such as identity cards and surveillance cameras, the passive measures such as weakening of double jeopardy and presumption of innocence.


The arguments
The resistants
Gabriel Syme and Perry de Havilland of Samizdata.net to rally the Anglosphere behind the UK.
White Rose contributors are those bloggers and non-bloggers who oppose restrictions on personal liberties.

To find out how to become a White Rose contributor, please go here.
Friday, December 12, 2003
Home Office Officials Refuse to Answer ID Cost Questions

The Home Affairs Select Committee met last night to consider Big Blunkett's plan to impose compulsory National Identity Cards on innocent British citizens. They interviewed some of the Home Office officials who have accepted responsibility for disassembling our civil liberties by implementing the cards.

Of particular interest to the Committee was the cost of the scheme. Despite being asked no less than seven times, the Home Office officials repeatedly refused to answer the question saying only that it would be between 1.3 thousand million and 3.1 thousand million pounds. As Committee Chair John Denham pointed out, a range of 2 thousand million pounds is unacceptably broad. And that's assuming that the project remains on budget!

This unwillingness to talk openly about cost suggests a possible weak point within the Government. It is probably worth pressing this when contacting your MP or the media.

It's especially ironic that the reason given for refusing to answer was "commercial confidentiality". It seems that civil servants expect to have their privacy protected whilst they invade ours.

Full story in The Guardian

Cross-posted from The Chestnut Tree Cafe



Comments

We were at the Home Affairs Committee oral evidence session, but our report and comments differ quite a lot from that of the professional media who also reported on the same session. Check out the BBC Parliament Tv broadcast on Saturday 13th December 18:00 and make up your own mind.

http://www.spy.org.uk/spyblog/archives/000137.html

Posted by: Watching Them, Watching Us on December 13, 2003 05:54 AM

Is "unacceptably broad" some sort of parliamentary euphemism for "it appears the Home Office really has no idea what it will cost and doesn't care"?

Posted by: Guy Herbert on December 14, 2003 06:28 PM
Post a comment








    


    •