White Rose is a protest blog collective focusing on civil liberties in the UK.
It was set up to point a finger at the erosion of personal freedom in the UK.
Government's active measures introduce new means of control such as identity cards and surveillance cameras, the passive measures such as weakening of double jeopardy and presumption of innocence.


The arguments
The resistants
Gabriel Syme and Perry de Havilland of Samizdata.net to rally the Anglosphere behind the UK.
White Rose contributors are those bloggers and non-bloggers who oppose restrictions on personal liberties.

To find out how to become a White Rose contributor, please go here.
Thursday, July 17, 2003
Tories join in

The Telegraph reports that the Conservatives yesterday joined civil rights groups in voicing opposition to the Government's proposals to introduce compulsory identity cards and criticised David Blunkett, the Home Secretary, for masking his true intentions behind "spin and obscurity".

Plans to announce the scheme in the Commons before Parliament rises today have been shelved - officially because of pressure on parliamentary time - but the Home Office said yesterday that the proposals for the ID card were "progressing well", with an announcement expected in the autumn.

Oliver Letwin, the shadow Home Secretary, said he remained "highly dubious" about any move towards a compulsory ID card.

The issue of an identity card is too important a one, with too far-ranging implications for our liberties, for the Home Secretary to resort to spin and obscurity.

Home Office estimates of the cost of the scheme range from £1.6 to £3.14 billion but Simon Davies, of Privacy International, says the true cost will be very much higher. Mr Davies led a campaign against an Australian ID card in the 1980s. Initially the plan was popular but opposition grew strongly when the scheme was finally unveiled and the government was forced to abandon it.

We know from industry estimates that a 'smart' card with biometric information such as the one proposed will cost well over £100 per head, so the final cost will be more like £5.5 billion.

This is a high risk political gamble for David Blunkett. He knows that popular opposition will mushroom once people understand the implications of the card, so he is being meticulous in concealing his ultimate ambitions.



Comments

Assuming the Telegraph is right, this gives us a a reprieve of a couple of months. We need to spend that time mobilising popular opinion. We also need to get the Tories to harden their position - if you have a Tory MP write to him or her today congratulating Letwin on his support for traditional British freedoms.

Oh, and I notice that the Telegraph asks people to email them with comments. Could be an opportunity to get the phrase "Big Blunkett" into wider circulation.

Posted by: Trevor Mendham on July 17, 2003 12:32 PM
Post a comment








    


    •