White-Rose-relevant comments from Jim of Jim's Journal about Homeland Security:

Now I happen to have a lot against Bush ... besides the fact that I did not vote for him in 2000 and the only good thing I could think of to say about him then was that at least he wasn't Al Gore.

I don't think highly of his handling of national security – within the United States – that is, this ridiculous bureaucratic monstrosity called Homeland Security, headed by that total jerk Ridge. (What's that matter with Ridge? Well, here's just one thing, but it shows how wrong he is ... He wants to use Homeland Security to track down child porn peddlers and Internet perverts. My goodness, how could there be anything wrong with that? Well, what does that have to do with national security? We have a multiplicity of police forces to handle ordinary crimes. Homeland Security was supposed to be about protecting us from terrorists, you know, 9/11 ... So if the terrorist problem is so under control that he has to go looking for other jobs to keep his minions busy, well let's just save a few billion dollars and dissolve his agency instead.)

Indeed, but that of course is not how these things work. Once an "agency" is set up, it mmediately goes looking for other stuff to do as well, and hence in the fullness of time, potentially, instead.

Principles, once conceded in one policy area immediately go wandering, often in the form of the very agency that embodies the original concession.