White Rose is a protest blog collective focusing on civil liberties in the UK.
It was set up to point a finger at the erosion of personal freedom in the UK.
Government's active measures introduce new means of control such as identity cards and surveillance cameras, the passive measures such as weakening of double jeopardy and presumption of innocence.


The arguments
The resistants
Gabriel Syme and Perry de Havilland of Samizdata.net to rally the Anglosphere behind the UK.
White Rose contributors are those bloggers and non-bloggers who oppose restrictions on personal liberties.

To find out how to become a White Rose contributor, please go here.
Sunday, October 12, 2003
Big Mother

Big Mother

Here's another of those Has This Person Been Reading White Rose? pieces, this time by Jemima Lewis in today's Telegraph:

Some pestilential scientist has invented a device that allows parents to trace their child's location via his mobile telephone. This is the latest in a rash of new gadgets designed to make sure children never get a moment's privacy. There is the tracker watch, which uses Global Positioning System satellites to pinpoint a child's whereabouts (and which, once affixed around the poor blighter's wrist, cannot be removed without alerting the police). There are similar devices that can be sewn into the child's clothing or school bag, or - creepiest of all - surgically implanted under the skin. And last month we saw the unveiling of a gadget which, when installed in the family car, reports back to parents where, and how, their child is driving.

It seems extraordinary that, at a time when children's rights are more loudly invoked than ever before, there is not an uproar over this invasion of their civil liberties. There is no statistical justification for it: children in Britain are no more likely to be abducted by a stranger now than in 1975. It can serve only to foster parental paranoia and make children feel more hounded than ever.

Who would want to be young in the reign of Big Mother?

Often one says at this point: read it all. But that's all of it. It's just a diary bit in a longer piece which is about lots of other things as well. So, no need.



Comments

The full article makes some interesting points. As someone who has always been fascinated by history - everything from ancient Egypt to the Cold War, I am frequently bemused by the lack of knowledge encountered among my peers. BTW, I was educated in a comprehensive during the seventies and learned history chronologically...

As for the tagging - they do that to criminals, don't they?

Posted by: Mark Ellott on October 12, 2003 05:36 PM
Post a comment








    


    •