White Rose is a protest blog collective focusing on civil liberties in the UK.
It was set up to point a finger at the erosion of personal freedom in the UK.
Government's active measures introduce new means of control such as identity cards and surveillance cameras, the passive measures such as weakening of double jeopardy and presumption of innocence.


The arguments
The resistants
Gabriel Syme and Perry de Havilland of Samizdata.net to rally the Anglosphere behind the UK.
White Rose contributors are those bloggers and non-bloggers who oppose restrictions on personal liberties.

To find out how to become a White Rose contributor, please go here.
Monday, September 01, 2003
Tesco ends trial of CCTV spy chip on razor blades

Tesco has ended a trial of new technology that tracked customers buying Gillette razor blades. The retailer denied that the technology was being used for security reasons, but shoppers considered it to be an invasion of their privacy.

After Tesco's use of radio frequency identification (RFID) chips was revealed, protests were held outside the store and consumers wrote to Gillette demanding that plans to use the chips be shelved.

Gillette has reportedly backed away from introducing RFID chips into individual products on a wider scale, despite being an enthusiastic supporter of the technology. The company is heavily involved in the Auto-ID consortium, which is looking at ways of developing RFID for shops, but it says that chips may not be used to monitor individual products for at least 10 years.

Tesco said its Cambridge trial had finished as planned; it was only meant to be in place for six months from January, and decisions had not been affected by the protests. The company has now moved to its next phase in testing RFID, by placing chips in DVDs at its store in Sandhurst, Berkshire.

Barry Hugill, of the civil rights group Liberty, was concerned at "function creep", in other words, information recorded for one purpose being used for another.

We want clear legal guidelines as to what information companies, government agencies, local authorities are allowed to glean [and] what they can do with it.


Comments

I think its wrong because its inviading peoples privacy

Posted by: James on November 24, 2003 10:41 AM

i think its just to get hold of customers adresses and send them presured mail to join groups spend more money on things not needed. i understand they need to keep track on what is sold but this is going to far.

Posted by: joanna on September 30, 2004 02:43 PM
Post a comment








    


    •