White Rose is a protest blog collective focusing on civil liberties in the UK.
It was set up to point a finger at the erosion of personal freedom in the UK.
Government's active measures introduce new means of control such as identity cards and surveillance cameras, the passive measures such as weakening of double jeopardy and presumption of innocence.


The arguments
The resistants
Gabriel Syme and Perry de Havilland of Samizdata.net to rally the Anglosphere behind the UK.
White Rose contributors are those bloggers and non-bloggers who oppose restrictions on personal liberties.

To find out how to become a White Rose contributor, please go here.
Thursday, July 31, 2003
More political posturing

The Guardian reports:

All asylum seekers who fail to register with the government should be deprived of access to British schools and hospitals, the former cabinet minister Stephen Byers said yesterday in a controversial speech designed to reassure working class voters that Labour understood their concerns about immigration.

At his monthly press conference yesterday, Tony Blair promised that the government would go further on asylum, and said he thought identity cards were right in principle even if the logistical cost was daunting.

In principle there is a case, in my view, for Britain moving towards ... ID cards. However, there are huge logistical and cost issues that need to be resolved. It's worth looking - which is what we are doing - at how you can resolve them, but it's not a quick-fix for the system because of the amount of time and the logistical process in introducing them.

Mr Byers, in his proposals on illegal entrants who fail to claim asylum, proposed that all employers should get automatic fines of £2,000 for each illegal immigrant found at work.

This would make the body creating the demand for labour - the farmer, hotel or restaurant owner, multinational company or government department - take responsibility for the people employed on their behalf. Special squads should target known areas of illegal working.


Comments

Last time I looked, employers were already able to be fined £5,000 a head for employing people not entitled to work in this country. What's new? Are they to be fined for being fooled by forged documents? Or is the minister proposing to call the fine an administrative penalty and dispense with all that inconvenient legal process and requirement for proof?

Posted by: Guy Herbert on July 31, 2003 08:55 PM
Post a comment








    


    •